Disaster Risk Gateway - User contributions [en]

Nighttime Light Satellite Data for Recovery

2024-06-18T15:51:30Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Sophie Buijs et al. '''Description''' This method zooms in on post-disaster recovery, a crucial but often overlooked aspect of disaster management. While there’s been progress in understanding how communities bounce back from single hazards, we still have a lot to learn about recovery from multi-hazard events. Most existing studie..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Sophie Buijs et al.

'''Description'''

This method zooms in on post-disaster recovery, a crucial but often overlooked aspect of disaster management. While there’s been progress in understanding how communities bounce back from single hazards, we still have a lot to learn about recovery from multi-hazard events. Most existing studies focus on specific types of hazards or regions, leaving a gap in our understanding of recovery dynamics on a broader scale.

To fill this gap, the study compares economic recovery after both single and multi-hazard events across continents. It uses nighttime light data as a proxy for economic recovery, tracking changes in brightness over time after different types of disasters. By comparing recovery patterns, the study aims to shed light on the unique challenges and dynamics of bouncing back from multi-hazard events.

The findings will not only help policymakers and aid organizations refine their disaster management strategies but also pave the way for future research into the social and economic factors that influence recovery in multi-hazard scenarios.
'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Artificial Intelligence for Climate Change Multi-Risk Assessment

2024-06-18T15:50:08Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Davide Ferreira, Ngoc Diep Nguyen et al. '''Description''' With extreme climate events becoming more frequent and severe, it’s crucial to have effective methods for assessing multiple risks at once. Traditional approaches often struggle to untangle the complex interactions between different hazards and how they affect vulnerability..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Davide Ferreira, Ngoc Diep Nguyen et al.

'''Description'''

With extreme climate events becoming more frequent and severe, it’s crucial to have effective methods for assessing multiple risks at once. Traditional approaches often struggle to untangle the complex interactions between different hazards and how they affect vulnerability and exposure. To develop better strategies for reducing risks and preparing for disasters, we need to understand how extreme climate events impact both society and nature.

That’s where Artificial Intelligence (AI) comes in. AI is a powerful tool for analyzing large amounts of environmental data, bringing together information from various sources, and understanding complex relationships.

In a recent study, researchers have created a step-by-step framework using AI to assess the risks posed by extreme climate events in the Veneto Region of North-East Italy. Here’s how it works:

# They use statistical methods and machine learning to identify unusual patterns in climate data, pinpointing extreme events like heatwaves, droughts, storm surges, heavy rainfall, and strong winds.
# They combine these patterns to create sets of multi-hazard events, considering factors like timing and location overlap. This helps them understand how different hazards might compound or occur in sequence.
# They use supervised machine learning algorithms to model how susceptible different areas are to various combinations of hazards. By training the model with data from past events, they can identify which vulnerability and exposure factors are most important and pinpoint areas at high risk of multiple hazards.

This comprehensive approach, tested as part of the Myriad-EU project in the Veneto Region, provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics of multi-risk events. It helps us assess and predict the impacts of these events under different climate change scenarios, ultimately aiding in better decision-making and disaster planning.

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Heat Related Human Impact Functions

2024-06-18T15:46:50Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Kelley de Polt et al. '''Description''' We have developed a methodology to determine impact-relevant durations for climate hazards, with anexample application to extreme heat events in Germany (De Polt et al., 2023). Impact-relevant durations can then be utilised to develop time-dependent intensity-damage functions which allow us to..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Kelley de Polt et al.

'''Description'''

We have developed a methodology to determine impact-relevant durations for climate hazards, with anexample application to extreme heat events in Germany (De Polt et al., 2023). Impact-relevant durations can then be utilised to develop time-dependent intensity-damage functions which allow us to identifyhazard-impact thresholds. Input parameters for both methods include hazard metrics (e.g., temperature for heat waves; soil moisture for droughts) as well as impact/damage (e.g., mortality; hospitalisations) or societal response metrics (e.g., media attention). Our approach is quantitative and data-driven, enabling precise analysis of hazards in the context of their impacts. These methods, which are applicable a range of both single and multi-hazard scenarios, currently utilise datasets within the health sector and public attention domains, though have potential for expansion to other sectors where temporally consistent impact datasets are available.

[[File:How-define-1024x399.png|thumb|center| Approach for impact-relevant durations]]

[[File:Input-data-1024x460.png|thumb|center| Approach for time-dependent intensity-damage functions]]

'''Technical considerations'''

ADD TEXT HERE

'''Keywords'''

ADD TEXT HERE

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

File:Input-data-1024x460.png

2024-06-18T15:46:03Z

Wiebke:

Approach for time-dependent intensity-damage functions

File:How-define-1024x399.png

2024-06-18T15:45:23Z

Wiebke:

Approach for impact-relevant durations

Multi-hazards events database

2024-06-18T15:41:19Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': WP4 MYRIAD Team '''Description''': We are studying traditional disaster databases, such as EM-DAT, and are using a method called disaster forensics to study past global disasters and learn from them. With input from over 100 contributors, we’ve compiled a database of around 160 multi-hazard events. We analyse each case in detail, f..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': WP4 MYRIAD Team

'''Description''':

We are studying traditional disaster databases, such as EM-DAT, and are using a method called disaster forensics to study past global disasters and learn from them. With input from over 100 contributors, we’ve compiled a database of around 160 multi-hazard events. We analyse each case in detail, focusing on interactions between hazards and the effectiveness of adaptation measures. Our aim is to provide insights that can inform decision-making processes. By understanding what adaptation measures worked well in specific conditions and which ones did not, we hope to assist pilots in making informed choices. For example, after a flood, City A constructed flood-resistant buildings on stilts, but when an earthquake hit ten years later, this measure proved ineffective. Through our research, we provide a catalogue of past disasters, detailing different hazards and the success of adaptation measures.

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Multi-hazard Susceptibility Maps

2024-06-18T15:36:34Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Timothy Tiggeloven et al. '''Description''' A multi-hazard susceptibility map is a specialized tool used to assess the potential of various natural hazards occurring simultaneously or in sequence within a geographic area. Unlike traditional hazard maps that focus on singular events like floods or earthquakes, multi-hazard susceptibili..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Timothy Tiggeloven et al.

'''Description'''

A multi-hazard susceptibility map is a specialized tool used to assess the potential of various natural hazards occurring simultaneously or in sequence within a geographic area. Unlike traditional hazard maps that focus on singular events like floods or earthquakes, multi-hazard susceptibility maps predict the potential of multiple disasters overlapping, such as floods coinciding with earthquakes or wildfires. These maps are invaluable for informing disaster preparedness and response efforts. By identifying areas vulnerable to combinations of hazards, authorities can strategically plan resource allocation, develop comprehensive emergency management strategies, and enhance community resilience.

[[File:Simple MH Flowchart-small-1024x399.png|thumb|center]]

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

File:Simple MH Flowchart-small-1024x399.png

2024-06-18T15:36:22Z

Wiebke:

Overview of machine learning method

Interview Methodology

2024-06-18T15:33:56Z

Wiebke:

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Nicole van Maanen et al.

Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Understanding and managing the various risks that come with multiple hazards is a challenge, demanding a thorough understanding that transcends mere theoretical frameworks.While recent theories have helped, there’s still a big missing piece: practical advice for people dealing with these risks directly. To achieve this, we developed an interview methodology with which we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews in hazard-prone regions like the Canary Islands, Veneto, the Danube region, Scandinavia, and the North Sea. These interviews provide a rich tapestry of qualitative and quantitative data. Through these interviews, MYRIAD-EU gained valuable insights into the convergence of hazards, vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction measures. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, MYRIAD-EU aims to equip stakeholders with the knowledge needed to enhance preparedness and response strategies. Additionally, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of multi-hazard risks, aiding in the formulation of informed mitigation strategies for the future.

[[File:Interview-methodology.png|thumb|center]]

''Example question:''
In your opinion, what are the most important characteristics that determine the vulnerability to different hazards in your region?

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Vulnerability Indicators in the Disaster Risk Reduction Cycle

2024-06-18T15:33:28Z

Wiebke:

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Tristian Stolte et al.

Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Vulnerability indicators play a crucial role in all phases of the disaster risk reduction cycle, from mitigation to preparedness, response and finally recovery. These indicators provide valuable insights into the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. In MYRIAD we developed an overview of types of indicators that are in particular valuable in each of the phases.

During the preparedness phase, vulnerability indicators help identify at-risk populations and prioritize resources for mitigation efforts. By understanding the social, economic, and demographic characteristics of vulnerable groups, authorities can tailor their preparedness plans to address specific needs and enhance community resilience.

In the response phase, vulnerability indicators guide emergency responders in allocating resources and assistance to the most vulnerable individuals and communities. This ensures that help reaches those who need it most urgently, minimizing the impact of disasters on disadvantaged groups.

During the recovery phase, vulnerability indicators inform the allocation of recovery funds and resources, ensuring that marginalized communities receive equitable support to rebuild and recover. By addressing the underlying vulnerabilities that exacerbate the impacts of disasters, authorities can promote more inclusive and sustainable recovery efforts.

In the mitigation phase, vulnerability indicators help identify areas where targeted interventions can reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience over the long term. By addressing systemic inequalities and social disparities, authorities can mitigate the root causes of vulnerability and build more resilient communities capable of withstanding future disasters.

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Interview Methodology

2024-06-18T15:33:00Z

Wiebke:

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Jaro Mysiak, Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward

Centro Euro-Mediteranneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC)

Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Understanding and managing the various risks that come with multiple hazards is a challenge, demanding a thorough understanding that transcends mere theoretical frameworks.While recent theories have helped, there’s still a big missing piece: practical advice for people dealing with these risks directly. To achieve this, we developed an interview methodology with which we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews in hazard-prone regions like the Canary Islands, Veneto, the Danube region, Scandinavia, and the North Sea. These interviews provide a rich tapestry of qualitative and quantitative data. Through these interviews, MYRIAD-EU gained valuable insights into the convergence of hazards, vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction measures. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, MYRIAD-EU aims to equip stakeholders with the knowledge needed to enhance preparedness and response strategies. Additionally, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of multi-hazard risks, aiding in the formulation of informed mitigation strategies for the future.

[[File:Interview-methodology.png|thumb|center]]

''Example question:''
In your opinion, what are the most important characteristics that determine the vulnerability to different hazards in your region?

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Interview Methodology

2024-06-18T15:30:09Z

Wiebke:

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward

Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Understanding and managing the various risks that come with multiple hazards is a challenge, demanding a thorough understanding that transcends mere theoretical frameworks.While recent theories have helped, there’s still a big missing piece: practical advice for people dealing with these risks directly. To achieve this, we developed an interview methodology with which we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews in hazard-prone regions like the Canary Islands, Veneto, the Danube region, Scandinavia, and the North Sea. These interviews provide a rich tapestry of qualitative and quantitative data. Through these interviews, MYRIAD-EU gained valuable insights into the convergence of hazards, vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction measures. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, MYRIAD-EU aims to equip stakeholders with the knowledge needed to enhance preparedness and response strategies. Additionally, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of multi-hazard risks, aiding in the formulation of informed mitigation strategies for the future.

[[File:Interview-methodology.png|thumb|center]]

''Example question:''
In your opinion, what are the most important characteristics that determine the vulnerability to different hazards in your region?

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Interview Methodology

2024-06-18T15:29:48Z

Wiebke: Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU) '''Description''' Understanding and managing the various risks that come with multiple hazards is a challenge, demanding a thorough understanding that transcends mere theoretical frameworks.Whi..."

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Nicole van Maanen, Marleen de Ruiter, Wiebke Jäger, Philip Ward
Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Understanding and managing the various risks that come with multiple hazards is a challenge, demanding a thorough understanding that transcends mere theoretical frameworks.While recent theories have helped, there’s still a big missing piece: practical advice for people dealing with these risks directly. To achieve this, we developed an interview methodology with which we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews in hazard-prone regions like the Canary Islands, Veneto, the Danube region, Scandinavia, and the North Sea. These interviews provide a rich tapestry of qualitative and quantitative data. Through these interviews, MYRIAD-EU gained valuable insights into the convergence of hazards, vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction measures. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, MYRIAD-EU aims to equip stakeholders with the knowledge needed to enhance preparedness and response strategies. Additionally, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the evolving landscape of multi-hazard risks, aiding in the formulation of informed mitigation strategies for the future.

[[File:Interview-methodology.png|thumb|center]]

''Example question:''
In your opinion, what are the most important characteristics that determine the vulnerability to different hazards in your region?

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

File:Interview-methodology.png

2024-06-18T15:25:50Z

Wiebke:

Overview of interview methodology

Vulnerability Indicators in the Disaster Risk Reduction Cycle

2024-06-18T15:21:47Z

Wiebke:

<div style="text-align:justify">
'''Year of publication''': In progress

'''Access''':

'''Link''':

'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Tristian Stolte, Nicole van Maanen

Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)

'''Description'''

Vulnerability indicators play a crucial role in all phases of the disaster risk reduction cycle, from mitigation to preparedness, response and finally recovery. These indicators provide valuable insights into the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. In MYRIAD we developed an overview of types of indicators that are in particular valuable in each of the phases.

During the preparedness phase, vulnerability indicators help identify at-risk populations and prioritize resources for mitigation efforts. By understanding the social, economic, and demographic characteristics of vulnerable groups, authorities can tailor their preparedness plans to address specific needs and enhance community resilience.

In the response phase, vulnerability indicators guide emergency responders in allocating resources and assistance to the most vulnerable individuals and communities. This ensures that help reaches those who need it most urgently, minimizing the impact of disasters on disadvantaged groups.

During the recovery phase, vulnerability indicators inform the allocation of recovery funds and resources, ensuring that marginalized communities receive equitable support to rebuild and recover. By addressing the underlying vulnerabilities that exacerbate the impacts of disasters, authorities can promote more inclusive and sustainable recovery efforts.

In the mitigation phase, vulnerability indicators help identify areas where targeted interventions can reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience over the long term. By addressing systemic inequalities and social disparities, authorities can mitigate the root causes of vulnerability and build more resilient communities capable of withstanding future disasters.

'''Technical considerations'''

'''Keywords'''

[[Category|CategoryPageName]]
</div>

Vulnerability Indicators in the Disaster Risk Reduction Cycle

2024-06-18T15:00:31Z

Wiebke: Created page with "Vulnerability indicators play a crucial role in all phases of the disaster risk reduction cycle, from mitigation to preparedness, response and finally recovery. These indicators provide valuable insights into the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. In MYRIAD we developed an overview of types of indicators that are in particular valuable in each of the phases. During the preparedness phase, vulnerability indi..."

Vulnerability indicators play a crucial role in all phases of the disaster risk reduction cycle, from mitigation to preparedness, response and finally recovery. These indicators provide valuable insights into the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. In MYRIAD we developed an overview of types of indicators that are in particular valuable in each of the phases.

During the preparedness phase, vulnerability indicators help identify at-risk populations and prioritize resources for mitigation efforts. By understanding the social, economic, and demographic characteristics of vulnerable groups, authorities can tailor their preparedness plans to address specific needs and enhance community resilience.

In the response phase, vulnerability indicators guide emergency responders in allocating resources and assistance to the most vulnerable individuals and communities. This ensures that help reaches those who need it most urgently, minimizing the impact of disasters on disadvantaged groups.

During the recovery phase, vulnerability indicators inform the allocation of recovery funds and resources, ensuring that marginalized communities receive equitable support to rebuild and recover. By addressing the underlying vulnerabilities that exacerbate the impacts of disasters, authorities can promote more inclusive and sustainable recovery efforts.

In the mitigation phase, vulnerability indicators help identify areas where targeted interventions can reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience over the long term. By addressing systemic inequalities and social disparities, authorities can mitigate the root causes of vulnerability and build more resilient communities capable of withstanding future disasters.