Multi-hazards events database: Difference between revisions
Created page with "<div style="text-align:justify"> '''Year of publication''': In progress '''Access''': '''Link''': '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': WP4 MYRIAD Team '''Description''': We are studying traditional disaster databases, such as EM-DAT, and are using a method called disaster forensics to study past global disasters and learn from them. With input from over 100 contributors, we’ve compiled a database of around 160 multi-hazard events. We analyse each case in detail, f..." |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 16:41, 18 June 2024
Year of publication: In progress
Access:
Link:
Organisation(s) / Author(s): WP4 MYRIAD Team
Description:
We are studying traditional disaster databases, such as EM-DAT, and are using a method called disaster forensics to study past global disasters and learn from them. With input from over 100 contributors, we’ve compiled a database of around 160 multi-hazard events. We analyse each case in detail, focusing on interactions between hazards and the effectiveness of adaptation measures. Our aim is to provide insights that can inform decision-making processes. By understanding what adaptation measures worked well in specific conditions and which ones did not, we hope to assist pilots in making informed choices. For example, after a flood, City A constructed flood-resistant buildings on stilts, but when an earthquake hit ten years later, this measure proved ineffective. Through our research, we provide a catalogue of past disasters, detailing different hazards and the success of adaptation measures.
Technical considerations
Keywords