Co-RISK: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:36, 4 April 2025

Publication Year: 2024

Access: Open

Link: https://gc.copernicus.org/articles/7/35/2024/

Author(s): Hillier, J.K. and van Meeteren

Organisation(s)/Authors: Loughborough University; Utrecht University

Description:

Co-RISK is a free paper-based ‘toolkit’ to help you better translate new science into your decision-making by co-designing (i.e. between university scientists and industrial or governmental partners) viable multi-disciplinary projects. Working together is not easy, and Co-RISK aims to accelerate the process by learning from, and building on experience. The toolkit consists of material (e.g. presentation, facilitators notes) for use in a workshop setting, facilitating project creation by multiple key actors (regulator, industrial partner, local policy group university-based scientist etc ….). Key outcomes of each workshop will be: • Jointly established list of the 10 questions of interest in the workshop’s focus area. • 2-3 draft projects frameworks (detail, but no sensitive information) to be shared by participants. • Raised awareness of other actors’ needs and motivations. A full description and evaluation example is giving in the journal article (https://gc.copernicus.org/articles/7/35/2024/). This was on the subject of ‘UK co-occurring natural hazard insurance risks’, but it is applicable to other countries and sectors.

Technical Considerations:

Very few. This is an open access, free ‘toolkit’ consisting of the Powerpoint slides and guidance notes to run a workshop. The ‘Maps’ to be filled in either need to be printed out, or the Powerpoint/pdf versions might be edited by an online tool of choice.

Key Words:

Multi-hazard risk; stakeholder; collaboration; project co-design

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div style="text-align:justify">
+{{MHRA
-'''Year of publication''': 2023
+|Publication Year=2024
+|Access=Open
+|Link=https://gc.copernicus.org/articles/7/35/2024/
+|Author(s)=Hillier, J.K. and van Meeteren
+|Organisation(s)=Loughborough University; Utrecht University
+|Description=Co-RISK is a free paper-based ‘toolkit’ to help you better translate new science into your decision-making by co-designing (i.e. between university scientists and industrial or governmental partners) viable multi-disciplinary projects. Working together is not easy, and Co-RISK aims to accelerate the process by learning from, and building on experience. The toolkit consists of material (e.g. presentation, facilitators notes) for use in a workshop setting, facilitating project creation by multiple key actors (regulator, industrial partner, local policy group university-based scientist etc ….). Key outcomes of each workshop will be:
-'''Access''': Open
+• Jointly established list of the 10 questions of interest in the workshop’s focus area.
-'''Link''': https://zenodo.org/records/8282815
+• 2-3 draft projects frameworks (detail, but no sensitive information) to be shared by participants.
-'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Tristian Stolte, Elco Koks, Hans de Moel, Lena Reimann, Jasper van Vliet, Marleen de Ruiter, Philip Ward
+• Raised awareness of other actors’ needs and motivations.
-Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)
-'''Description'''
+A full description and evaluation example is giving in the journal article (https://gc.copernicus.org/articles/7/35/2024/). This was on the subject of ‘UK co-occurring natural hazard insurance risks’, but it is applicable to other countries and sectors.
+|Technical Considerations=Very few. This is an open access, free ‘toolkit’ consisting of the Powerpoint slides and guidance notes to run a workshop. The ‘Maps’ to be filled in either need to be printed out, or the Powerpoint/pdf versions might be edited by an online tool of choice.
-VulneraCity is a database of unique urban vulnerability drivers for six different hazards (Coastal flooding, Pluvial flooding, Earthquakes, Heatwaves, Drought, Waterborne diseases), providing descriptions, classifications, and sources. Next to the drivers, VulneraCity contains several examples of directional vulnerability dynamics. The drivers and dynamics are collected from over 450 individual studies, based on a systematic literature review.
+|Key Words=Multi-hazard risk; stakeholder; collaboration; project co-design
+}}
-A ''vulnerability driver'' is a feature that could alter the vulnerability of an (urban) area to a natural hazard. This is different from a ''vulnerability indicator'', which is a measure to operationalize or quantify vulnerability. For instance, poverty would be a driver of vulnerability, of which an indicator could be the number of people below the poverty line.
-'''Technical considerations'''
--
-'''Keywords'''
-VulneraCity; Vulnerability; Urban; Cities; Disaster risk; Vulnerability dynamics
-Back to '''[[Multi-hazard Risk Assessment|Multi-hazard Risk Assessment]]'''
-</div>