Vulnerability Indicators in the Disaster Risk Reduction Cycle: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Link''': | '''Link''': | ||
'''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Tristian Stolte | '''Organisation(s) / Author(s)''': Tristian Stolte et al. | ||
Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU) | Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:33, 18 June 2024
Year of publication: In progress
Access:
Link:
Organisation(s) / Author(s): Tristian Stolte et al.
Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (IVM-VU)
Description
Vulnerability indicators play a crucial role in all phases of the disaster risk reduction cycle, from mitigation to preparedness, response and finally recovery. These indicators provide valuable insights into the underlying factors that influence a community’s ability to withstand and recover from disasters. In MYRIAD we developed an overview of types of indicators that are in particular valuable in each of the phases.
During the preparedness phase, vulnerability indicators help identify at-risk populations and prioritize resources for mitigation efforts. By understanding the social, economic, and demographic characteristics of vulnerable groups, authorities can tailor their preparedness plans to address specific needs and enhance community resilience.
In the response phase, vulnerability indicators guide emergency responders in allocating resources and assistance to the most vulnerable individuals and communities. This ensures that help reaches those who need it most urgently, minimizing the impact of disasters on disadvantaged groups.
During the recovery phase, vulnerability indicators inform the allocation of recovery funds and resources, ensuring that marginalized communities receive equitable support to rebuild and recover. By addressing the underlying vulnerabilities that exacerbate the impacts of disasters, authorities can promote more inclusive and sustainable recovery efforts.
In the mitigation phase, vulnerability indicators help identify areas where targeted interventions can reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience over the long term. By addressing systemic inequalities and social disparities, authorities can mitigate the root causes of vulnerability and build more resilient communities capable of withstanding future disasters.
Technical considerations
Keywords